Presentation: ecology and evolution of seaweed diversification
These are the notes for a presentation I just uploaded to SlideShare. I gave this as a seminar at the University of Melbourne last Tuesday and at LaTrobe University two days later.
Slide 1
- introduce
Slide 2
- outline of the talk
Slide 3
- student Dioli Payo
- genus Portieria
- pretty thallus shape – well-described with fractals
- only two species known worldwide
- her goal was to look at population structure of the species
Slide 4
- her sampling localities in the Philippines
Slide 5
- sequenced rapidly evolving marker from mt genome
- we applied GMYC to the data
- this is a quick ‘n dirty method to detect species boundaries
- she found 21 species instead of 1
- these are distinct species that have been separated for millions of years
- species are cryptic => impossible to distinguish morphologically
- they have limited distribution ranges, often a single island or bay
Slide 6
- what does this mean globally?
- our global sampling is not nearly as good
- we’re at 50 species and counting
- difficult to extrapolate but it could be well over 100 spp
Slide 7
- we have a situation where much of what we think we know about species diversity is wrong
- not only the case for Portieria, we know this is true for many algae, although perhaps not as spectacularly high diversities
- what does this mean…
- as a taxonomist to describe => they all look identical
- every conservation decision that has ever been made that involves seaweeds needs to be revisited
- more work for me at all levels: (1) difficult to study biodiversity patterns in meaningful way, (2) cannot trust a single species record from the literature or from online databases, (3) much denser sampling is needed in the field and DNA sequencing for every single specimen
Slide 8
- move on to biodiversity
- focus on understanding processes => diversification
- geographic and ecological dimensions
Slide 9
- our approach consists of this
Slide 10
- our approach for the more visually inclined
- start with phylogeny calibrated in geological time
Slide 11
- add information about contemporary species
- in this case macroecological: sea surface temperature
Slide 12
- inference about past using models of evolutionary change
- this way we can study how evolution of thermal affinities relate to figure below
- since the phylogeny includes speciation events (bifurcations) we can relate niche evolution to diversification
Slide 13
- these are the three model systems we’ve developed
- very dense global sampling
- starting to get to grips with what the species are and where they occur
Slide 14
- start with geographic patterns of diversification
Slide 15
- we aimed for general patterns, not individual case studies
- hence focus on entire order of brown algae, the Dictyotales
- you see some of the genera illustrated here
Slide 16
- they are Olivier’s pet group so we know a lot about them
- distributed worldwide across tropics and temperate water
- we have > 2000 barcoded or accurately identified specimens belonging to 236 species
- gives us pretty good idea of the distributions of the species
Slide 17
- we want to know…
- we have …
- so we need a window into the past to see what happened
Slide 18
- as explained before, models of evolutionary change offer a solution
- relevant evolutionary events are parameters in the model, which is then optimized
- with optimized model, we can infer things about the evolutionary events and estimate the ancestral situation
- for biogeography => relevant parameters relate to how species move around
- simple form with areas A/B
- explain parameters for dispersal-extinction-cladogenesis
- generalize to more areas
- what it can do => phylogeny + current distribution => biogeographic history
Slide 19
- we did this for Dictyotales
- simple subdivision of world in three biogeographic regions: northern temperate, tropical, southern temperate
- remember colors
Slide 20
- change to Preview (cf. next page)
Slide 21
- zoom in on terminal species, legend corresponds to colors in slide 19
- reconstructed ancestral states are also there
- show example of speciation associated with S to N shift
- show example of speciation within region
- base of Dictyoteae: temperate southern hemisphere
- some lineages stay there (e.g. Dilophus)
- at base of Dictyota more generalist
- gives rise to a mixture of tropical and temperate lineages
- top lineage: origin is tropical, moves into N temp on several occasions
- next lineage down: all temperate, with S origin, dispersing into N
- lineage all the way at bottom: starts in tropics, moves into S, later moves from S into N
Slide 22
- tree is great to look at specific cases but doesn’t global picture
- these are summary graphs
- dispersal rate through time => 3 types are substantially higher than others
- movement out of tropics
- movement from S to N
Slide 23
- put this in perspective
- slide shows decreasing SST through Cenozoic
- narrowing tropical belt
- more temperate habitat opening up in S and N
- movement from tropics to temperate
- north is major sink because there was almost no temperate habitat => tropics and S feed into N
Slide 24
- move on to macroecological correlates of diversification
Slide 25
- case study Halimeda
- diversity map => high diversity in tropics, with a few species in temperate habitat
- so where is the origin? tropics or temperate
- how often to niche shifts between temperate and tropical occur?
Slide 26
- we have lots of DNA barcodes
- we get SST for localities using satellite imagery
- we get an idea of SST affinities of species
- how do affinities evolve?
Slide 27
- similar methods as before => model optimized
- every tip is species
- color gradient shows SST affinities
- tropical origin
- marker conservatism for tropical SST in clades 2-5
- conservatism lostin clade 1 => 4 transitions into temperate
- in perspective: show time frame and correspondence to narrowing tropics
Slide 28
- do these modes of speciation and the shifting niches have implications for the distribution of biodiversity on the planet?
Slide 29
- typical diversity patterns: well-characterized => bell-shaped around tropics
- many possible explanations
- my goal is to provide macroevolutionary perspective
- higher species turnover in tropics => higher rate of diversification
Slide 30
- seaweeds don’t follow general rules => bimodal diversity pattern
- do same evolutionary processes hold or is diversification faster in temperate habitats?
Slide 31
- Codium is suitable case study with similar diversity map
Slide 32
- evolution of SST affinities traced along phylogeny
- clade 3: almost half of all species in young clade, only 25 Ma
- seems to be associated with move from temperate into tropics
Slide 33
- logical question: is diversification faster in tropics
Slide 34
- model of diversification dynamics in which diversification is function of SST
Slide 35
- optimum value of beta => positive association between SST and diversification
- higher rates in tropics
- so process seems similar to other organisms and reasons for bimodal diversity pattern has to be sought elsewhere
Slide 36
- so why is Codium richer in colder water?
- probably due to historical causes
- origin is in temperate waters and a lot of the branches remain in those temperate waters
- it appears that the genus has only invaded the tropics recently and that, because of that, the majority of species is still in temperate water
Slide 37
- no such thing for Dictyota => constant diversification explains it better
Slide 38
- previous test only checked for very simple relationship between SST and diversification
- many other types of relationships you could imagine
- for example one could expect that clades whose niches are more evolvable manage to diversify more rapidly
- we do seem to find that in Dictyota
- split phylogeny up in major clades
- positive relationship between rate of SST evolution and diversification
- slope very deviant from that simulated under null model
Slide 39
- lineages with many allopatric sister species along latitudinal thermal gradient diversify more rapidly
- we seem to have a situation where clades that some clades manage to speciate more often along the latitudinal thermal gradient than others
- clades that do, diversify more rapidly, probably because their presence in both temperate and more tropical habitats permits further radiation in those habitats
Slide 40
- so, we saw that evolvability of the macroecological niche leads to more rapid diversification
- where does that evolvability come from?
Slide 41
- student Vanessa Marcelino was studying the evolution of microhabitat traits and macroecological traits in Halimeda
- she decided to investigate in more detail whether there could be an interaction going on between micro and macro
- Halimeda is mostly tropical and of tropical origin
- found in different habitats on coral reef
- exposed wave-swept and more sheltered e.g. reef slope but also lagoon
- one could expect that SST evolution is faster for species in exposed microhabitats because they experience more extreme environments (low tide, wave action, etc)
Slide 42
- compare model in which rate of SST evolution is constant with one in which it depends on whether or not species lives in exposed habitat
Slide 43
- 2-rate model performs considerably better
- difference in AIC 7.6 => integrated across uncertainty in exact pattern of evolution of microhabitat preference
- lineages from exposed habitat 4.3x faster
- so, it appears that microhabitat specializations can be exaptations for macroecological shifts
Slide 44
- wrap up
- for speciation, no “one rule fits all” => examples of everything you can imagine (allopatric vs. within region, associated with niche shift vs. conservatism)
- for distributions, some patterns did come out => tropics act as source, with confirmation of “out of the tropics” hypothesis for Dictyotales; north is major sink because so recent
- for diversification, all kinds of things going on: (1) simple relation with historical effect in Codium, (2) role of evolvability in Halimeda and Dictyota, (3) I think the evolvability aspect may emerge as a general pattern as more taxa are studied
- reach out => (1) better models can be designed, (2) evolutionary dimension is applicable to any problem that any biologist is working on
Slide 45
- these folks did the hard work
Slide 46
- funding agencies
- collaborators and collectors => due to the dense sampling that we need, lots of samples are required, and we could not do what we do if it wasn’t for all these people volunteering their time
Advertisements